Skip to main content
This document is directional, and it will be kept up to date as the project moves.Some of the fields, names, structures and flows in it are suggestions, written down so there is something concrete to react to. They are not requirements. OnlinePOS knows its own system; REKOM asks OnlinePOS to use that expertise to guide the implementation: which names fit what already exists, which flows make sense and which do not. REKOM is not married to any specific naming or flow. The goal is the common, easiest, least complex solution for both sides.A concrete example: if this document asks for a totalDiscount and OnlinePOS already has an orderDiscount that works, REKOM wants to be told to use that instead, not to have a totalDiscount built specifically for REKOM.This matters for the success of the project. The question both sides should keep asking is “What would I do if this were my company?” That is how the solution becomes the best possible one.
Version 2 — 8 October 2026. This document replaces OnlinePOS’s Version 1 (28 Aug 2026, asynchronous model) and its 4 Sep 2026 update (synchronous model). It was agreed on 7 Oct 2026 that REKOM rewrites the description with the clarified points and sends it back to OnlinePOS for review. This is that rewrite.

​
Purpose

REKOM operates a loyalty programme for its guests. When a guest pays by card at an OnlinePOS till in a REKOM venue, the card is recognised through Nexi Engage, the basket is sent to the REKOM backend, and the REKOM backend returns the basket with the guest’s loyalty benefits applied as discounts. The guest approves one payment on the final amount. OnlinePOS keeps its audit trail unchanged; loyalty and discount reporting live in REKOM. This document describes the integration end to end: the systems involved, what each party is responsible for, the decisions that are already settled, REKOM’s proposals for everything that is not, and a draft API contract for the two endpoints the REKOM backend exposes to OnlinePOS.

​
Parties

​
How to read this document

Every statement carries one of four statuses, so OnlinePOS can tell at a glance what is settled and what needs an answer.

Agreed

Settled between the parties. The date it was agreed is given in-line, e.g. agreed 7 Oct 2026. Sources are the shared Google Doc, the “Rekom Loyalty Beskrivelse” thread and the “Rekom | Nexi Engage integration” thread.

Proposed

REKOM’s Version 2 proposal. Marked proposed — for OnlinePOS confirmation (or Nexi, where relevant). Silence is not acceptance; each one is listed in the open points.

Open

Not yet resolved. Each open point names an owner and, where REKOM has a view, REKOM’s proposal. See the open points.

Not chosen

An alternative that was on the table and was rejected, marked ❌ with the date and the reason. Kept so nobody re-proposes it without knowing why it was dropped. Example: Option 2 for store enrollment.
Directional (see the banner at the top of this page). Wherever this document names a field, header, enum value or JSON structure (calculationId, loyaltyId, noDiscount, lineDiscountCode, the context block, the totals block, the error codes, and so on), the name shows which information is exchanged, not its spelling. REKOM adopts whatever OnlinePOS has by default and does not require any specific name. Pages that rely on such names repeat this as a “Directional” note.

​
Where to start

Architecture overview

The systems, the two integration surfaces and the context diagram.

Loyalty basket flow

The synchronous call, its latency contract, timeouts, fallback and statuses.

Basket rules

What the REKOM backend may change, the discount code, receipt text, rounding and validation.

API reference

Draft OpenAPI 3.1 contract for POST /v1/onlinepos/basket and POST /v1/onlinepos/sale.

Decision log

Every decision with date, status and source.

Open points

What still needs an answer, who owns it, and what REKOM proposes.

​
Status of this document

Commercial terms (estimates, billing) are deliberately outside this document and are handled separately between the parties.